These are not JPEG artifacts on Hale Crater
For those of you trying to claim that these structures on hale crater Mars are JPEG artifacts, get educated or stop trying to debunk the truth. the public has a right to know and you can not stop us from finding out the truth. Our technology is smarter than your deception attempts! Brought to you by the New World Conspiracies Investigation Operation (NWCIO) www.nwcio.com.
Incoming search terms:
- hale colony mars
- nasa hale crater
- ALL PICTURES OF HALESS CRATER
- The truth i am impressed with your pictures they can speak for you
- new evidence about crater hale
- nasa jpeg artifacts
- mars hale crater fake
- mars hale crater
- mars artifacts 2010
- MARS ARTIFACTS
Tags: artifacts, Conspiracies, Crater, Hale, Hale Crater, JPEG, mars, These, Truth
About Ufo Seeker
@crackhead007 – Thank you for such a great response. Its words such as yours that entices me to release more convincing videos that I had simply been holding back because the debunkers and disbelievers just want something to feed upon and scoff at through their willingness to remain ignorant of truth.
yallways, you are type of person the world needs in this time to help people transition from sheep into the humans we were intended to be. This was an amazing video, I was convinced when I saw the face on mars, but this, this is just the cherry on top. Keep making videos, because if at least one person sees this and his or her mind is opened, then that is one step forward to global awakening. It will happen soon and the powers that be know it and are doing everything to prevent it.
@strictpolicy – No, the images were taken from different angles at different times.
@chancevaught78 – I am ex-military intelligence, Desert Storm era. Computers and Electronics (74C).
@chancevaught78 – Yes, I too am interested in all fields of anomalies. Nonetheless, I simply began to lose interest in uploading the evidence because the best evidence is not capable of being uploaded… and if it were, the blind brainwashed public will simply deny it or never seek it out to begin with. therefore I do my own research for my own benefit in the meantime… until I find the time to reveal something new here in the hopes that its not deleted by youtube.
@yallways but continuing – i am impressed with your depth of knowledge – you provide evidence and facts in precise and impartial manor. your information rings of truth. can i ask (if i may) how you come by your knowledge of NASA /ESA SOP’s ?
regards
many thanks for your response. you certainly appear to know your facts. for many years my own interest has been in the many archaeological anomalies right here on earth. i take nothing without considerable evidence and or a strictly logical approach to any circumstantial data that presents itself. after all the simplest solution is often the correct one. off world anomalies are a new sphere of interest to me but seem a natural progression as a related field for research
@chancevaught78 – Due to a shared link between ESA and NASA, I beleive that the ESA is not really familiar with the fact that something is hidden in those images. They simply provide what NASA provides them. The ESA and NASA computers are linked in such a way that image information (written data only) are synced. Therefore NASA can not hide from them that the images were taken… only what is in those images by airbrushing them out. This is why NASA themselves do not provide the images freely.
well it seems clear that there is something there that was worked by intelligent hands. i have done the comparisons also. this is the best evidence i have seen yet. though i ask myself why esa would release any image at all if it was a secret. surely only non descript desert images would be released. still it seems clear from our earliest history on earth that much of the accepted version of history is incorrect. i wonder when people will open their eyes to what is right infront of them!
@TUBEORATER Alright then, how come you can see the lines on both nasa (not as clear) and ESA, and by 3 different pictures, can find the exact same objects in each? I wanst a believr until I dug, and man how can you not realise these pics are fact!
@jroswald – You don’t see the point here? Well, that’s a good indication that you might be in need of some education. Start with 1st grade and move up from there. We’re all rootin’ for ya, friend. Good luck!
I dont see the point here..
If you want to be taken seriously by the opposing viewpoint, consider….
construed
definite
vertically
nasa or whoever is control of these images would cut, copy and paste so it is possible the same jpeg artifacts appear in the same spot if they are covering something up
what are the chances of esa or nasa giving us a none edited photo of hale crater.
i mean one with no false color or anything else added to it?
These pictures are hardly the result of “picture compression”. These are not compression artifacts. I have never before seen compression artifacts casting a 3 dimensional profile. These images are also casting their own shadows that all run in the same direction as other larger items in the image. LET ME REPEAT: Compression artifacts don’t make their own shadows and have a 3 dimensional profile in all 3 axises.
NASA : Never A Straight Answer.
PS: I have further evidence to support this as well but it’s not plausible to upload to youtube. It would never get approved. I plan on revealing some of it in the next issue of GOinternet Magazine… FEB 2010 issue …as long as problems do not arise that will prevent it.
Digital terrain models do not use jpeg nor jpeg compression. The argument is simple. Regardless of them being single or not (in which case I know for a fact that two of them are completely separate images) either way, jpeg artifacts are not possible in 3D rendering models originally using TIFF as it’s output. Since this argument began, they have removed all but the jpeg images from the site in order to support this false claim. I still have the original tiff images here.
@yallways I have done that and I found that these images are all from a single stereo image.
Quote; The perspective views were calculated from the digital terrain model derived from the stereo channels.
I’m not a debunker, I’m an investigator.
These are digital terrain models.
We need to have images documented to be from a separate time and place to prove our case.
People can get all the official data they want by simply going to the ESA site and downloading the same images for themselves. I’m tired of trying to prove anything to disbelievers and people W/O common sense. If people want to remain blind drones then it’s all on them. I’m moving on.
Please provide photo id data.
Many are “perspectives” from a single jpeg source.
yes, mars has wind
You are welcome. I am glad to help. More convincing videos are to come soon once I get over this Pneumonia completely. Have been in the hospital for several days but will get to them.
to avoid winds, a crater would be a good place to build anything on mars then……
I’m familliar with JPEG artifacts that even change with the amount of compression used. I totally agree,,,,these shapes must represent real features on the surface unless NASA is involved in a big hoax. Thanks for this video. I didn’t even know that there are different images of the same area from different angles..
watch?v=WAuQQ1EpWVA